Historically, AWS required express permission to run any form of vulnerability assessment on servers within the AWS infrastructure. To fulfill their end of the shared responsibility model, enterprises must conduct regular AWS vulnerability scanning. ![]() IP addresses within AWS should be treated in the same way as any private or public IP addresses, and corporate vulnerability management policies should be extended to include servers hosted within AWS. In this shared responsibility model, it wouldn't be viable for Amazon to provide vulnerability management, as it would require the cloud provider to have access to administrator- or root-level credentials for each server, which would be a data privacy nightmare.Įqually important to note is although the Amazon-owned infrastructure is regularly tested for vulnerabilities, this does not imply security on the individual IP addresses your enterprise controls. ![]() This distinction is not always understood.Īmazon will secure the hardware, software, networking and facilities that run AWS cloud services, but the client assumes responsibility for managing other environments, including guest OSes, all patching and updates, application software security, identity and access management, firewall configuration and more. The security of the individual servers is the responsibility of the client - not Amazon - as part of the shared responsibility model.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |